Adrian Beltre Responds to People Touching His Head

Written by Michael Clair on .

Hi, Adrian Beltre here. Yes, that Adrian Beltre. And yeah, I get it, you all think it's pretty hilarious when people try to touch my head and I freak out. I mean, I'm a modern man of the internet, I've seen the gifs and even I have a laugh. Just look at some of these moving pictures, how could you not chuckle: 

 
(Gif via @DShep25)
 
But see, I'm not a cold, humorless guy. I just read Tim Allen's book, Don't Stand Too Close to a Naked Man-- talk about a hoot! And if I was really that protective over parts of my body, wouldn't I wear a protective cup while playing third base? 
 
But, and here's the thing, my BRAIN is in my head you guys. And the brain, if you were unaware, is mankind's most precious gift. It is where our memories, our thoughts, our insights are stored and recorded. As Richard Feynman said:
no comments

The Otherworldly Gems of the Baseball Hall of Fame's Scouting Database

Written by Michael Clair on .

We like to pretend that we know most of what's happening on and around baseball, but the fact is that we don't. Not really. We know nearly nothing of baseball in the 1800s, we make educated guesses at baseball before the advent of television, and even today, with our newfangled hickeymajigs, our defensive ratings are woefully inaccurate. Now though, we have been given the briefest and tiniest of glimpses into the world of the baseball scout, that unsung hero who, as Kevin Goldstein reminded us during the Up and In podcast days, spends much of his time pooping in McDonald's restrooms. 

The Baseball Hall of Fame, when they weren't funding unnecessary steroid research, put together the greatest database of baseball scouting reports ever seen. In the past, these were rarely released, and so people have gone (justifiably) crazy for the Bo Jackson, Ken Griffey Jr, and Chipper Jones reports that are full of glowing phrases like Monster of Mash, Mayhem, and Moxie. However, there is so much more to be unearthed. Because while any scout worth employing could look at those players and see greatness, it's the other players, the mid-rotation guys, the utility infielders, that required someone to take a leap of faith. And these scouting reports document that. 

There is David Eckstein's which, in the first sentence of his summary, refers to him as a "gutty gamer."  This is perhaps the first published occurrence of the phrase being used on him, it's a historical landmark. Or there's the report filed with the Chicago White Sox that called Tim Wakefield a non-prospect because he lacked a fastball and his splitter should be thrown harder. Then there are the ones like Jim Abbott's where he's proclaimed a "WINNER" all in caps, and dammit, that's fine with me. Jim Abbott, playing and succeeding at Major League Baseball with one arm, is a winner. 

no comments

When is 'Good' Baseball Actually Bad for the Sport?

Written by Michael Clair on .

I promise you that I'm not trying to drum up page views by writing articles with titles like "Farts: How Your Butt is Killing the Planet" or "Which Game of Thrones Character Are You? A 20 Part Slideshow NSFW." But I am worried about the future of baseball as a spectator sport. 

 
Don't get me wrong, I certainly love baseball just as it is and, for most of the people who write blogs and read baseball coverage on an endless loop, waking up at 3 am in a cold sweat because you forgot to check Baseball Prospectus, that will always be the case. At least until the sun turns black and oil-hungry marauders make playing a game too dangerous while we huddle in a cave for our family's survival. But there are also people that follow cricket or Ironman tournaments closely, and that doesn't make any sense. Baseball is changing and I worry if it's at its own harm. 
 
I'm not naive enough to think that the game hasn't constantly been in a state of evolution. Equipment changes, improvements in medicine and training, clubs moving to cities and environments that didn't use to hold teams, perhaps even the Fall network TV schedule-- all have served to change the game in one way or another. In the 1920s and '30s, batters ruled all, with teams averaging 5.55 runs per game in 1930 with the average batter hitting .296. The 1960s were pitcher dominated, with runs dropping to 3.69 per game by 1972 with the average player posting an OPS of .664, or roughly one Clint Pennington. But these, as far as I know (and perhaps a better student of baseball's history will correct me), were largely natural shifts that occurred, the pitching dominated 60s and early 70s changing only once MLB intervened with a rule change. And while I believe that sabermetrically inclined fans are some of the best that exist, being the ones dedicated to learning more about the game rather than simply enjoying it with mirthful ignorance, baseball's latest shift has plenty to do with their hard-fought lessons. 
no comments

DUI Suspensions: Wait, Do We Really Mean This?

Written by Bill on .

I may have been operating for a while on a rather foolish assumption. 

See, whenever a player has been caught driving while intoxicated -- like yesterday, after Yovani Gallardo was picked up with an almost impossible to believe .22 blood-alcohol level -- and the blogosphere/twitterati have piped up with their outrage over the deep moral inconsistency in baseball, I've joined in.

Drug use (both the "PE" and recreational varieties), which may or may not affect a player's performance on the field but is ultimately more or less harmless in real life, is punished severely and condemned harshly, while driving a vehicle while intoxicated, which does not directly impact play on the field but does seriously endanger real people's lives (as baseball was reminded, still pretty recently), generally earns one little mild verbal admonishment and nothing else. 

Baseball's attitude (or lack thereof) toward DUIs is silly, and kind of embarrassing. So we whine a bit. Some of the whines take a form like: where's his suspension? Can we suspend DUI Guy for 50 games too? And so on.  

But a thought occurred to me today for the first time: you guys don't actually mean that, do you?

no comments

The Pirates and the Crushing Blow of Six Horribly Wretched Games

Written by Michael Clair on .

The Pirates, and by extension their fans, should be used to losing by now. Much like a garbage man should be no longer mind hefting around bags of refuse and Lindsay Lohan should be accustomed to court-ordered drug rehab, the Pirates should be nearly immune to the crushing sting of defeat. If 20 consecutive losing seasons and two straight years of contention followed by the crushing betrayal of August and September (including a Houston Astros-ian 20-39 after August 1st), losing should be easy. But baseball, that cruel mistress, always teases players and fans with its promise of better tomorrows. 

And it's not like a bad start ensures a poor season. The Pirates were 2-4 through six games last season, before fighting for first place into July. The 2011 team was 4-2 en route to a 72-90 record. Last year's World Series winning Giants dropped their first three and were 2-4. So the simple fact is that two series at the beginning of April really doesn't say a whole lot.  But the Pirates, with a few decent mid-rotation options and a dreadlocked and likable superstar finally had a club that seemed to be able to best that mythical 81 wins. So while starting 1-5 is not great and can be overcome, scoring all of eight runs in that time is still pretty disgusting. 

To give example, the Pirates have scored fewer runs than Coco Crisp and Adam Jones have for each of their respective clubs. The Pirates, should they continue on this path of damnation and brimstone are currently on pace to score a whopping 216 runs for the season, only slightly more than the 192 the Original Billy Hamilton scored for the 1892 Philadelphia Phillies. 

no comments

My Strange Love Affair With Fantasy Baseball

Written by Michael Clair on .

Chances are, during the first batch of games on Monday, while constantly checking your fantasy lineup, you realized one of two things. Either 1) You didn't do nearly as good a job drafting your fantasy team as you thought or 2) You really don't seem to care as much as the other people around you. And if you're in a third camp, that of the smugly satisfied fantasy player, while I don't wish any true ill will on you, I do hope your next fountain soda doesn't have nearly enough of that flavor syrup. Serves you right, you stuck up prig. 

You see, I used to be in that first camp before I realized that not only was I unskilled at the art of 5x5, I was simultaneously overwhelmed by the constant update of lineups and disinterested in the scouring of waiver wire for saves. All of the things I loved about baseball, the action, narrative, even statistics that I would immerse myself in on Baseball-Reference.com (and before its existence, the thousands of baseball cards that littered my closet), weren't represented in fantasy. Focusing so narrowly on home runs, RBI, batting average and steals, or wins, WHIP, saves, and strikeouts, sucked all the joy out of baseball. Sure, the truly great players were always valuable, but except in the deepest of leagues, fourth outfielders and back of the rotation starters were worth nothing. And you never got any points for a great catch or a guy handing a ball to a fan with only two outs in the inning. 

no comments

The Artist Formerly Known as TCM's 2013 Predictions

Written by Michael Bates on .

These predictions are obligatory. Once a year, as the season starts, I’m compelled to make a record of what I think is going to happen in Major League Baseball, so that you can point and laugh at me once the season’s done, and you can draw inspiration that damn near any idiot can write about baseball on the Internet. It’s a public service that I provide to you, who are the public. I am very magnanimous like that.


Feel free to disagree, call me names, or threaten my physical well-being in the comments.

no comments

Josh Lueke, Redemption, Rape and Baseball

Written by Bill on .

I want to read a redemption story about Josh Lueke. 

I do. Most of my friends and colleagues would rather never hear or read his name again, and I get that, and honestly, I'd be more than okay with that. But a redemption story would be pretty cool. 

I mean, a real one. Not this horseshit. [FINAL EDIT DAMMIT: the author has done the right thing and turned that link into what appears to be a real, heartfelt apology. You can read the google cache copy of the original post here, thanks to Zach Sanders.]

The thing is: what we know of the available evidence pretty strongly suggests that Josh Lueke raped another person. He served 42 days for "false imprisonment with violence," but if a person has been falsely imprisoned and the imprisoner's semen turns up on the other person's clothes and inside the other person's body, that's an awful lot like rape. 

And that's not "a critical mistake," as someone named Robbie Knopf says it is in the first link above. That's a deliberate act that anyone, even a child (and at 23 at the time and having gone through high school and at least some college, Lueke was no child), would know intrinsically was very wrong. It's not something he has to (or gets to) "persevere" through, as Knopf says. It's something his victim can "persevere" (and hopefully has); it's something he has to live with, for the rest of his life; it's something for which he certainly could and probably should have spent considerably more time in jail; it's emphatically not a hardship he has to buck up and get through.

no comments

Mike Piazza's Love Affair With the Commercial

Written by Michael Clair on .

Recently I decided to read Mike Piazza's new book, Long Shot. I wasn't expecting literature that would challenge my deepest held beliefs nor was I hoping for lyrical prose poetry. So in the end, I guess I got what a paid for: a mild diversion from my eventual demise co-written by baseball's greatest offensive catcher and mustache grower. 

Along the way, I also learned that Mike Piazza likes a lot of things. For instance: 

- Hitting

- Olive Garden

- Girls

- Hitting

- Baseball (sometimes)

- Hitting

- Heavy Metal

- Hitting to Heavy Metal

- Eric Karros

I'm sure there were some other things in the book, though I missed them entirely. 

After reading, I wanted to dig a little deeper. Not into the psyche of the man or even into his statistical record as a player. No, I wanted to look at his commercial body of work. At the things that would make him popular to the common, non-baseball-loving citizen. In other words, television commercials. Here they are.

Mike Piazza for Fox Baseball:

no comments

The Abraham Lincolns of Baseball

Written by Michael Clair on .

While watching Daniel Day Lewis accept yet another Oscar award on Sunday night for his performance in Lincoln (really, when he's nominated they need to create a Best Actor Not Named Daniel Day Lewis category), I wondered about the other Abraham Lincolns out there, specifically the baseballing ones. Especially with political cartoons like this one now filling American textbooks: 

 
 
(Library of Congress by way of New York Times)
 
Firing up the ole Baseball-Reference machine, I searched for Abraham Lincoln and was mildly shocked at what I found. 
 
Three ballplayers, all named Abraham Lincoln, and all Major Leaguers. Nary a minor leaguer in the bunch and all having wrapped up their playing careers by 1921. While there may have been a handful of minor leaguers who never earned the right to have their middle names recorded, we'll simply have to assume they never existed. Also, dear Mothers of America, why did you stop naming your children after the Great Emancipator, instead looking to the Aidens and Braydens of the world?
no comments